Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
BMJ. 2016 April 20; DOI:10.1136/bmj.i2037
Akol AD, Caluwaerts S, Weeks AD
BMJ. 2016 April 20; DOI:10.1136/bmj.i2037
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013 September 29; Volume 107 (Issue 11); DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trt090
Liddle KF, Elema R, Thi SS, Venis S
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013 September 29; Volume 107 (Issue 11); DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trt090
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides TB treatment in Galkayo and Marere in Somalia. MSF international supervisory staff withdrew in 2008 owing to insecurity but maintained daily communication with Somali staff. In this paper, we aimed to assess the feasibility of treating TB in a complex emergency setting and describe the programme adaptations implemented to facilitate acceptable treatment outcomes.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Confl Health. 2017 May 15; Volume 11 (Issue 1); 7.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-017-0110-4
Coldiron ME, Roederer T, Llosa AE, Bouhenia M, Madi S, et al.
Confl Health. 2017 May 15; Volume 11 (Issue 1); 7.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-017-0110-4
The Central African Republic has known long periods of instability. In 2014, following the fall of an interim government installed by the Séléka coalition, a series of violent reprisals occurred. These events were largely directed at the country's Muslim minority and led to a massive displacement of the population. In 2014, we sought to document the retrospective mortality among refugees arriving from the CAR into Chad by conducting a series of surveys.
Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Lancet. 2013 March 16; Volume 381 (Issue 9870); 901.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60664-9
Fernandez G, Boulle P
Lancet. 2013 March 16; Volume 381 (Issue 9870); 901.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60664-9
Journal Article > ReviewFull Text
Confl Health. 2023 August 22; Volume 17 (Issue 1); 39.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-023-00534-9
Leresche E, Hossain MS, De Rubeis ML, Hermans V, Burtscher D, et al.
Confl Health. 2023 August 22; Volume 17 (Issue 1); 39.; DOI:10.1186/s13031-023-00534-9
Implementation science scholars argue that knowing ‘what works’ in public health is insufficient to change practices, without understanding ‘how’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ something works. In the peer reviewed literature on conflict-affected settings, challenges to produce research, make decisions informed by evidence, or deliver services are documented, but what about the understanding of ‘how’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ changes occur? We explored these questions through a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature based on core dimensions of the Extended Normalization Process Theory. We selected papers that provided data on how something might work (who is involved and how?), where (in what organizational arrangements or contexts?) and why (what was done?). We searched the Global Health, Medline, Embase databases. We screened 2054 abstracts and 128 full texts. We included 22 papers (of which 15 related to mental health interventions) and analysed them thematically. We had the results revised critically by co-authors experienced in operational research in conflict-affected settings. Using an implementation science lens, we found that: (a) implementing actors are often engaged after research is produced to discuss feasibility; (b) new interventions or delivery modalities need to be flexible; (c) disruptions affect how research findings can lead to sustained practices; (d) strong leadership and stable resources are crucial for frontline actors; (e) creating a safe learning space to discuss challenges is difficult; (f) feasibility in such settings needs to be balanced. Lastly, communities and frontline actors need to be engaged as early as possible in the research process. We used our findings to adapt the Extended Normalization Process Theory for operational research in settings affected by conflicts. Other theories used by researchers to document the implementation processes need to be studied further.
Journal Article > ResearchFull Text
Public Health Action. 2019 September 1; Volume 9 (Issue 3); 107-112.; DOI:10.5588/pha.18.0045
Gil Cuesta J, Trelles M, Naseer A, Momin A, Ngabo Mulamira L, et al.
Public Health Action. 2019 September 1; Volume 9 (Issue 3); 107-112.; DOI:10.5588/pha.18.0045
English
Français
Español
INTRODUCTION
Conflicts frequently occur in countries with high maternal and neonatal mortality and can aggravate difficulties accessing emergency care. No literature is available on whether the presence of conflict influences the outcomes of mothers and neonates during Caesarean sections (C-sections) in high-mortality settings.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the presence of conflict was associated with changes in maternal and neonatal mortality during C-sections.
METHODS
We analysed routinely collected data on C-sections from 17 Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) health facilities in 12 countries. Exposure variables included presence and intensity of conflict, type of health facility and other types of access to emergency care.
RESULTS
During 2008–2015, 30,921 C-sections were performed in MSF facilities; of which 55.4% were in areas of conflict. No differences were observed in maternal mortality in conflict settings (0.1%) vs. non-conflict settings (0.1%) (P = 0.08), nor in neonatal mortality between conflict (12.2%) and non-conflict settings (11.5%) (P = 0.1). Among the C-sections carried out in conflict settings, neonatal mortality was slightly higher in war zones compared to areas of minor conflict (P = 0.02); there was no difference in maternal mortality (P = 0.38).
CONCLUSIONS
Maternal and neonatal mortality did not appear to be affected by the presence of conflict in a large number of MSF facilities. This finding should encourage humanitarian organisations to support C-sections in conflict settings to ensure access to quality maternity care.
Conflicts frequently occur in countries with high maternal and neonatal mortality and can aggravate difficulties accessing emergency care. No literature is available on whether the presence of conflict influences the outcomes of mothers and neonates during Caesarean sections (C-sections) in high-mortality settings.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the presence of conflict was associated with changes in maternal and neonatal mortality during C-sections.
METHODS
We analysed routinely collected data on C-sections from 17 Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) health facilities in 12 countries. Exposure variables included presence and intensity of conflict, type of health facility and other types of access to emergency care.
RESULTS
During 2008–2015, 30,921 C-sections were performed in MSF facilities; of which 55.4% were in areas of conflict. No differences were observed in maternal mortality in conflict settings (0.1%) vs. non-conflict settings (0.1%) (P = 0.08), nor in neonatal mortality between conflict (12.2%) and non-conflict settings (11.5%) (P = 0.1). Among the C-sections carried out in conflict settings, neonatal mortality was slightly higher in war zones compared to areas of minor conflict (P = 0.02); there was no difference in maternal mortality (P = 0.38).
CONCLUSIONS
Maternal and neonatal mortality did not appear to be affected by the presence of conflict in a large number of MSF facilities. This finding should encourage humanitarian organisations to support C-sections in conflict settings to ensure access to quality maternity care.
Journal Article > ResearchSubscription Only
World J Surg. 2021 February 9; Volume 45 (Issue 5); 1400-1408.; DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-05972-1
Rahman A, Chao TE, Trelles M, Dominguez LB, Mupenda J, et al.
World J Surg. 2021 February 9; Volume 45 (Issue 5); 1400-1408.; DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-05972-1
BACKGROUND
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides surgical care in fragile states, which are more vulnerable to conflict. The primary objective of this study was to compare the indications for operative intervention in surgical projects in fragile states during periods of active conflict (CON) and non-conflict (NON-CON). In addition, risk factors for non-obstetric and obstetric operative mortality were identified.
METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of MSF surgical projects in fragile states January 1, 2008–December 31, 2017. Variables considered in the analysis include age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, emergency status, re-intervention status, indication for surgical intervention, and conflict/non-conflict time period.
RESULTS
There were 30 surgical projects in 13 fragile states with 87,968 surgical interventions in 68,667 patients. Obstetric needs were the most common indication for surgical intervention (n = 28,060, 31.9%) but were more common during NON-CON (n = 23,142, 35.7%) compared to CON periods (n = 4,918, 21.2%, p < 0.001). Trauma was more common during CON (42.0%) compared to NON-CON (23.0%) periods (p < 0.001). Non-obstetric operative mortality was similar during CON (0.2%) compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p = 0.920), but obstetric operative mortality was higher (0.5%) during CON compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p < 0.001) periods. Risk factors for obstetric and non-obstetric mortality included age ≥ 30 years, ASA greater than 1, and emergency intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian surgeons working in fragile states should be prepared to treat a range of surgical needs including trauma and obstetrics during conflict and non-conflict periods. The mortality in obstetric patients was higher during conflict periods, and further research to understand ways to protect this vulnerable group is needed.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides surgical care in fragile states, which are more vulnerable to conflict. The primary objective of this study was to compare the indications for operative intervention in surgical projects in fragile states during periods of active conflict (CON) and non-conflict (NON-CON). In addition, risk factors for non-obstetric and obstetric operative mortality were identified.
METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of MSF surgical projects in fragile states January 1, 2008–December 31, 2017. Variables considered in the analysis include age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, emergency status, re-intervention status, indication for surgical intervention, and conflict/non-conflict time period.
RESULTS
There were 30 surgical projects in 13 fragile states with 87,968 surgical interventions in 68,667 patients. Obstetric needs were the most common indication for surgical intervention (n = 28,060, 31.9%) but were more common during NON-CON (n = 23,142, 35.7%) compared to CON periods (n = 4,918, 21.2%, p < 0.001). Trauma was more common during CON (42.0%) compared to NON-CON (23.0%) periods (p < 0.001). Non-obstetric operative mortality was similar during CON (0.2%) compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p = 0.920), but obstetric operative mortality was higher (0.5%) during CON compared to NON-CON (0.2%, p < 0.001) periods. Risk factors for obstetric and non-obstetric mortality included age ≥ 30 years, ASA greater than 1, and emergency intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian surgeons working in fragile states should be prepared to treat a range of surgical needs including trauma and obstetrics during conflict and non-conflict periods. The mortality in obstetric patients was higher during conflict periods, and further research to understand ways to protect this vulnerable group is needed.
Journal Article > CommentaryFull Text
Lancet. 2000 June 10; Volume 355 (Issue 9220); 2067-2068.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02364-3
de Jong J, Mulhern M, Ford NP, van der Kam S, Kleber RJ
Lancet. 2000 June 10; Volume 355 (Issue 9220); 2067-2068.; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02364-3
Journal Article > LetterFull Text
Lancet. 2017 October 16; Volume 390 (Issue 10106); DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32677-6
White K
Lancet. 2017 October 16; Volume 390 (Issue 10106); DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32677-6
Other > Journal Blog
BMJ Opinion (blog). 2012 March 5
de Jong K
BMJ Opinion (blog). 2012 March 5